In section \ref
While we left the history of the name `sine' as an interesting research project in Section \ref, the names `tangent' and `secant' can be explained using the diagram below. Consider the acute angle \(\theta\) below in standard position. Let \(P(x,y)\) denote, as usual, the point on the terminal side of \(\theta\) which lies on the Unit Circle and let \(Q(1,y')\) denote the point on the terminal side of \(\theta\) which lies on the vertical line \(x=1\).
The word `tangent' comes from the Latin meaning `to touch,' and for this reason, the line \(x=1\) is called a tangent line to the Unit Circle since it intersects, or `touches', the circle at only one point, namely \((1,0)\). Dropping perpendiculars from \(P\) and \(Q\) creates a pair of similar triangles \(\Delta OPA\) and \(\Delta OQB\). Thus \(\frac = \frac\) which gives \(y' = \frac = \tan(\theta)\), where this last equality comes from applying Definition \ref. We have just shown that for acute angles \(\theta\), \(\tan(\theta)\) is the \(y\)-coordinate of the point on the terminal side of \(\theta\) which lies on the line \(x = 1\) which is \textit to the Unit Circle. Now the word `secant' means `to cut', so a secant line is any line that `cuts through' a circle at two points.\footnote.> The line containing the terminal side of \(\theta\) is a secant line since it intersects the Unit Circle in Quadrants I and III. With the point \(P\) lying on the Unit Circle, the length of the hypotenuse of \(\Delta OPA\) is \(1\). If we let \(h\) denote the length of the hypotenuse of \(\Delta OQB\), we have from similar triangles that \(\frac = \frac\), or \(h = \frac = \sec(\theta)\). Hence for an acute angle \(\theta\), \(\sec(\theta)\) is the length of the line segment which lies on the secant line determined by the terminal side of \(\theta\) and `cuts off' the tangent line \(x=1\). Not only do these observations help explain the names of these functions, they serve as the basis for a fundamental inequality needed for Calculus which we'll explore in the Exercises.
Of the six circular functions, only cosine and sine are defined for all angles. Since \(\cos(\theta) = x\) and \(\sin(\theta) = y\) in Definition \ref, it is customary to rephrase the remaining four circular functions in terms of cosine and sine. The following theorem is a result of simply replacing \(x\) with \(\cos(\theta)\) and \(y\) with \(\sin(\theta)\) in Definition \ref.
Reciprocal and Quotient Identities
It is high time for an example.
Example \(\PageIndex\): circularfunctionsex
Find the indicated value, if it exists.
Solution
While the Reciprocal and Quotient Identities presented in Theorem \ref allow us to always reduce problems involving secant, cosecant, tangent and cotangent to problems involving cosine and sine, it is not always convenient to do so.\footnote It is worth taking the time to memorize the tangent and cotangent values of the common angles summarized below.
Tangent and Cotangent Values of Common Angles
\[ \begin <|c|c||c|c|>\hline \theta (\mbox) & \theta (\mbox) & \tan(\theta) & \cot(\theta) \\ \hline 0^ & 0 & 0 & \text \\ \hline 30^ & \frac<\pi> & \frac> & \sqrt \\[2pt] \hline 45^ & \frac<\pi> & 1 & 1 \\[2pt] \hline 60^ & \frac<\pi> & \sqrt & \frac> \\[2pt] \hline 90^ & \frac<\pi> & \text & 0 \\[2pt] \hline \end \]
Coupling Theorem \ref with the Reference Angle Theorem, Theorem \ref, we get the following.
Generalized Reference Angle Theorem
The values of the circular functions of an angle, if they exist, are the same, up to a sign, of the corresponding circular functions of its reference angle. More specifically, if \(\alpha\) is the reference angle for \(\theta\), then:
The choice of the (\(\pm\)) depends on the quadrant in which the terminal side of \(\theta\) lies.
We put Theorem \ref to good use in the following example.
Find all angles which satisfy the given equation.
Solution
We have already seen the importance of identities in trigonometry. Our next task is to use use the Reciprocal and Quotient Identities found in Theorem \ref coupled with the Pythagorean Identity found in Theorem \ref to derive new Pythagorean-like identities for the remaining four circular functions. Assuming \(\cos(\theta) \neq 0\), we may start with \(\cos^(\theta) + \sin^(\theta) = 1\) and divide both sides by \(\cos^(\theta)\) to obtain \(1 + \frac<\sin^(\theta)><\cos^(\theta)> = \frac<\cos^(\theta)>\). Using properties of exponents along with the Reciprocal and Quotient Identities, this reduces to \(1 + \tan^(\theta) = \sec^(\theta)\). If \(\sin(\theta) \neq 0\), we can divide both sides of the identity \(\cos^(\theta) + \sin^(\theta) = 1\) by \(\sin^(\theta)\), apply Theorem \ref once again, and obtain \(\cot^(\theta) + 1 = \csc^(\theta)\). These three Pythagorean Identities are worth memorizing and they, along with some of their other common forms, are summarized in the following theorem.
The Pythagorean Identities
provided \(\cos(\theta) \neq 0\)
provided \(\sin(\theta) \neq 0\)
Trigonometric identities play an important role in not just Trigonometry, but in Calculus as well. We'll use them in this book to find the values of the circular functions of an angle and solve equations and inequalities. In Calculus, they are needed to simplify otherwise complicated expressions. In the next example, we make good use of the Theorems \ref and \ref.
Verify the following identities. Assume that all quantities are defined.
Solution
In verifying identities, we typically start with the more complicated side of the equation and use known identities to \textit it into the other side of the equation.
To verify \(\frac = \sin(\theta)\), we start with the left side. Using \(\csc(\theta) = \frac\), we get: \[ \dfrac = \dfrac<\frac> = \sin(\theta),\]
which is what we were trying to prove.
Starting with the right hand side of \(\tan(\theta) = \sin(\theta) \sec(\theta)\), we use \(\sec(\theta) = \frac\) and find: \[ \sin(\theta) \sec(\theta) = \sin(\theta) \dfrac = \dfrac = \tan(\theta),\]
where the last equality is courtesy of Theorem \ref.
Expanding the left hand side of the equation gives: \((\sec(\theta) - \tan(\theta)) (\sec(\theta) + \tan(\theta)) = \sec^(\theta) - \tan^(\theta)\). According to Theorem \ref, \(\sec^(\theta) - \tan^(\theta) = 1\). Putting it all together, \[(\sec(\theta) - \tan(\theta)) (\sec(\theta) + \tan(\theta)) = \sec^(\theta) - \tan^(\theta) = 1.\]
While both sides of our last identity contain fractions, the left side affords us more opportunities to use our identities.\footnote Substituting \(\sec(\theta) = \frac\) and \(\tan(\theta) = \frac\), we get:
which is exactly what we had set out to show.
The right hand side of the equation seems to hold more promise. We get common denominators and add:
At this point, it is worth pausing to remind ourselves of our goal. We wish to transform this expression into \(6\sec(\theta) \tan(\theta)\). Using a reciprocal and quotient identity, we find \(6\sec(\theta) \tan(\theta) = 6 \left(\frac\right) \left(\frac\right)\). In other words, we need to get cosines in our denominator. Theorem \ref tells us \(1 - \sin^(\theta) = \cos^(\theta)\) so we get:
It is debatable which side of the identity is more complicated. One thing which stands out is that the denominator on the left hand side is \(1-\cos(\theta)\), while the numerator of the right hand side is \(1+\cos(\theta)\). This suggests the strategy of starting with the left hand side and multiplying the numerator and denominator by the quantity \(1+\cos(\theta)\):
In Example \ref number \ref above, we see that multiplying \(1-\cos(\theta)\) by \(1+\cos(\theta)\) produces a difference of squares that can be simplified to one term using Theorem \ref. This is exactly the same kind of phenomenon that occurs when we multiply expressions such as \(1 - \sqrt\) by \(1+\sqrt\) or \(3 - 4i\) by \(3+4i\). (Can you recall instances from Algebra where we did such things?) For this reason, the quantities \((1-\cos(\theta))\) and \((1+\cos(\theta))\) are called `Pythagorean Conjugates.' Below is a list of other common Pythagorean Conjugates.
Verifying trigonometric identities requires a healthy mix of tenacity and inspiration. You will need to spend many hours struggling with them just to become proficient in the basics. Like many things in life, there is no short-cut here -- there is no complete algorithm for verifying identities. Nevertheless, a summary of some strategies which may be helpful (depending on the situation) is provided below and ample practice is provided for you in the Exercises.
Strategies for Verifying Identities
In Section \ref, we generalized the cosine and sine functions from coordinates on the Unit Circle to coordinates on circles of radius \(r\). Using Theorem \ref in conjunction with Theorem \ref, we generalize the remaining circular functions in kind.
Suppose \(Q(x,y)\) is the point on the terminal side of an angle \(\theta\) (plotted in standard position) which lies on the circle of radius \(r\), \(x^2+y^2 = r^2\). Then:
Solution
We may also specialize Theorem \ref to the case of acute angles \(\theta\) which reside in a right triangle, as visualized below.
Note: \begin \label
Suppose \(\theta\) is an acute angle residing in a right triangle. If the length of the side adjacent to \(\theta\) is \(a\), the length of the side opposite \(\theta\) is \(b\), and the length of the hypotenuse is \(c\), then
The following example uses Theorem \ref as well as the concept of an `angle of inclination.' The \index angle of inclination (or \index angle of elevation) of an object refers to the angle whose initial side is some kind of base-line (say, the ground), and whose terminal side is the line-of-sight to an object above the base-line. This is represented schematically below.
The angle of inclination from the base line to the object is \(\theta\).
Solution
As we did in Section \ref, we may consider all six circular functions as functions of real numbers. At this stage, there are three equivalent ways to define the functions \(\sec(t)\), \(\csc(t)\), \(\tan(t)\) and \(\cot(t)\) for real numbers \(t\). First, we could go through the formality of the wrapping function on page \pageref and define these functions as the appropriate ratios of \(x\) and \(y\) coordinates of points on the Unit Circle; second, we could define them by associating the real number \(t\) with the angle \(\theta = t\) radians so that the value of the trigonometric function of \(t\) coincides with that of \(\theta\); lastly, we could simply define them using the Reciprocal and Quotient Identities as combinations of the functions \(f(t) = \cos(t)\) and \(g(t) = \sin(t)\). Presently, we adopt the last approach. We now set about determining the domains and ranges of the remaining four circular functions. Consider the function \(F(t) = \sec(t)\) defined as \(F(t) = \sec(t) = \frac\). We know \(F\) is undefined whenever \(\cos(t) = 0\). From Example \ref number \ref, we know \(\cos(t) = 0\) whenever \(t = \frac<\pi> + \pi k\) for integers \(k\). Hence, our domain for \(F(t) = \sec(t)\), in set builder notation is \(\< t : t \neq \frac<\pi> + \pi k, \text \>\). To get a better understanding what set of real numbers we're dealing with, it pays to write out and graph this set. Running through a few values of \(k\), we find the domain to be \(\< t : t \neq \pm \frac<\pi>, \, \pm \frac<3\pi>, \, \pm \frac<5\pi>, \, \ldots \>\). Graphing this set on the number line we get
Using interval notation to describe this set, we get \[ \ldots \cup \left( -\frac<5\pi>, -\frac<3\pi>\right) \cup \left( -\frac<3\pi>, -\frac<\pi>\right) \cup \left(-\frac<\pi>, \frac<\pi>\right) \cup \left(\frac<\pi>, \frac<3\pi>\right) \cup \left(\frac<3\pi>, \frac<5\pi>\right) \cup \ldots \]
This is cumbersome, to say the least! In order to write this in a more compact way, we note that from the set-builder description of the domain, the \(k\)th point excluded from the domain, which we'll call \(x_\), can be found by the formula \(x_ = \frac<\pi> + \pi k\). (We are using sequence notation from Chapter \ref.) Getting a common denominator and factoring out the \(\pi\) in the numerator, we get \(x_ = \frac<(2k+1)\pi>\). The domain consists of the intervals determined by successive points \(x_\): \(\left(x_, x_<\mbox<\tiny \(k+1\)>>\right) = \left( \frac<(2k+1)\pi>, \frac<(2k+3)\pi>\right)\). In order to capture all of the intervals in the domain, \(k\) must run through all of the integers, that is, \(k = 0\), \(\pm 1\), \(\pm 2\), \ldots. The way we denote taking the union of infinitely many intervals like this is to use what we call in this text \index\index\textbf. The domain of \(F(t) = \sec(t)\) can now be written as
The reader should compare this notation with summation notation introduced in Section \ref, in particular the notation used to describe geometric series in Theorem \ref. In the same way the index \(k\) in the series
can never equal the upper limit \(\infty\), but rather, ranges through all of the natural numbers, the index \(k\) in the union
can never actually be \(\infty\) or \)-\infty\), but rather, this conveys the idea that \(k\) ranges through all of the integers. Now that we have painstakingly determined the domain of \(F(t) = \sec(t)\), it is time to discuss the range. Once again, we appeal to the definition \(F(t) = \sec(t) = \frac\). The range of \(f(t) = \cos(t)\) is \([-1,1]\), and since \(F(t) = \sec(t)\) is undefined when \(\cos(t) = 0\), we split our discussion into two cases: when \(0 < \cos(t) \leq 1\) and when \)-1 \leq \cos(t) < 0\). If \(0 < \cos(t) \leq 1\), then we can divide the inequality \(\cos(t) \leq 1\) by \(\cos(t)\) to obtain \(\sec(t) = \frac \geq 1\). Moreover, using the notation introduced in Section \ref, we have that as \(\cos(t) \rightarrow 0^\), \(\sec(t) = \frac \approx \frac<\mbox<\tiny very small \((+)\)>> \approx \mbox\). In other words, as \(\cos(t) \rightarrow 0^, \sec(t) \rightarrow \infty\). If, on the other hand, if \(-1 \leq \cos(t) < 0\), then dividing by \(\cos(t)\) causes a reversal of the inequality so that \(\sec(t) = \frac \leq -1\). In this case, as \(\cos(t) \rightarrow 0^\), \(\sec(t) = \frac \approx \frac<\mbox<\tiny very small \((-)\)>> \approx \mbox\), so that as \(\cos(t) \rightarrow 0^\), we get \(\sec(t) \rightarrow -\infty\). Since \(f(t) = \cos(t)\) admits all of the values in \([-1,1]\), the function \(F(t) = \sec(t)\) admits all of the values in \((-\infty, -1] \cup [1,\infty)\). Using set-builder notation, the range of \(F(t) = \sec(t)\) can be written as \(\ < u : \text\>\), or, more succinctly,\footnote from Section \ref.> as \(\< u :|u| \geq 1 \>\).\footnote Similar arguments can be used to determine the domains and ranges of the remaining three circular functions: \(\csc(t)\), \(\tan(t)\) and \(\cot(t)\). The reader is encouraged to do so. (See the Exercises.) For now, we gather these facts into the theorem below.
Domains and Ranges of the Circular Functions
\hspace \(\bullet \, \) The function \(f(t) = \cos(t)\) & \hspace \(\bullet \, \) The function \(g(t) = \sin(t)\) \\
\hspace -- has domain \((-\infty, \infty)\) & \hspace -- has domain \((-\infty, \infty)\) \\ [4pt]
\hspace -- has range \([-1,1]\) & \hspace -- has range \([-1,1]\) \\ [4pt]
\hspace \(\bullet \, \) The function \(F(t) = \sec(t) = \dfrac\)
\hspace -- has range \(\ < u : |u| \geq 1 \>= (-\infty, -1] \cup [1, \infty) \(
\hspace \(\bullet \, \) The function \(G(t) = \csc(t) = \dfrac\)
\hspace -- has range \(\ < u : |u| \geq 1 \>= (-\infty, -1] \cup [1, \infty) \(
\hspace \(\bullet \, \) The function \(J(t) = \tan(t) = \dfrac\)
\hspace -- has range \((-\infty, \infty)\)
\hspace \(\bullet \, \) The function \(K(t) = \cot(t) = \dfrac\)
\hspace -- has range \((-\infty, \infty)\)
We close this section with a few notes about solving equations which involve the circular functions. First, the discussion on page \pageref in Section \ref concerning solving equations applies to all six circular functions, not just \(f(t) = \cos(t)\) and \(g(t) = \sin(t)\). In particular, to solve the equation \(\cot(t) = -1\) for real numbers \(t\), we can use the same thought process we used in Example \ref, number \ref to solve \(\cot(\theta) = -1\) for angles \(\theta\) in radian measure -- we just need to remember to write our answers using the variable \(t\) as opposed to \(\theta\). Next, it is critical that you know the domains and ranges of the six circular functions so that you know which equations have no solutions. For example, \(\sec(t) = \frac\) has no solution because \(\frac\) is not in the range of secant. Finally, you will need to review the notions of reference angles and coterminal angles so that you can see why \(\csc(t) = -42\) has an infinite set of solutions in Quadrant III and another infinite set of solutions in Quadrant IV.
This page titled 1.3: The Six Circular Functions and Fundamental Identities is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Carl Stitz & Jeff Zeager via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform.